Ransomware attackers now targeting cities, municipalities to a larger extentBy Ryan Noik 18 December 2019 | Categories: news
TechSmart News sponsored by:
2019 has been a year in which cybersecurity has shown how critical it is, not just to businesses and individuals, but to societies as well.
Earlier this year we saw a ransomware attack that left City Power, and those relying on it, in the dark, just a couple of months after cybersecurity company warned about that very real possibility at its Cyber Security Weekend
This is not an arbitrary designation, but comes after the company’s researchers observed that at least 174 municipal institutions, with more than 3 000 subset organisations, have been targeted by ransomware during the last year. This represents a 60% increase at least, from the figure in 2018.
While threat actors’ demands would sometimes reach up to $5 000 000 (R70 million) actual costs and damages sustained during attacks are estimated to be larger. These are among the main findings of Kaspersky’s Security Bulletin: Story of the Year 2019.
It is no secret that ransomware is a notorious headache for the corporate sector, affecting businesses around the world for a number of years. It is openly achnowledged by businesses and often elaborated on in detail by cybersecurity companies across the board.
Societies under threat
But 2019 has seen the rapid development of an earlier trend, more disturbing trend, where malware distributors have targeted municipal organisations.
Researchers note that while these targets might be less capable of paying a large ransom, they are more likely to agree to cybercriminals’ demands. Blocking any municipal services directly affects the welfare of citizens and results, not only in financial losses but other socially significant and sensitive consequences.
Judging by publicly available information, the ransom amounts varied greatly, reaching up to $5 300,000 and $1 032 460 on average. The researchers noted that these figures do not accurately represent the final costs of an attack, as the long-term consequences are far more devastating.
To pay or not to pay
Once the initial panic of being subjected to a ransomware attacks gives way to what you are going to do about it, the inevitable question is do you give in to ransom demands or not?
“One must always keep in mind that paying extortionists is a short-term solution which only encourages criminals and keeps them funded to quite possibly return. In addition, once the city has been attacked, the whole infrastructure is compromised and requires an incident investigation and a thorough audit. This inevitably results in costs that are additional to ransom. At the same time, based on our observations cities might be sometimes inclined to pay because they usually cover the cyber risks with help of insurance and allocating budgets for incident response,” commented Fedor Sinitsyn, a security researcher at Kaspersky.
“However, the better approach would be also investing in proactive measures like proven security and backup solutions as well as regular security audit. While the trend of attacks on municipalities is only growing, it can be stifled and nipped in the bud by adjusting the approach to cybersecurity and what is more important by the refusal to pay ransoms and broadcasting this decision as an official statement,” he continued.
Naming and shaming the main culprits
The malware that was most often cited as a culprit varies too, yet three families were named as the most notorious, by Kaspersky researchers: Ryuk, Purga and Stop. Ryuk appeared on the threat landscape more than a year ago and has since been active all over the world, both in public and in the private sector. Its distribution model usually involves delivery via backdoor malware which in turn spreads by the means of phishing with a malicious attachment disguised as a financial document.
Purga malware has been known since 2016, yet only recently municipalities have been discovered to fall victims to this trojan, having various attack vectors – from phishing to brute force attacks. Stop cryptor is a relative novice as it is only one year old. It propagates by hiding inside software installers. This malware has been popular, number seven in the top 10 most popular cryptors ranking of Q3 2019.
To avoid such malware infiltrating organisations, Kaspersky provided the following recommendations:
- It is essential to install all security updates as soon as they appear. Most cyberattacks are possible by exploiting vulnerabilities that have already been reported and addressed, so installing the latest security updates lowers the chances of an attack
- Protect remote access to corporate networks by VPN and use secure passwords for domain accounts
- Always update your operating system to eliminate recent vulnerabilities and use a robust security solution with updated databases
- Always have fresh back-up copies of your files so you can replace them in case they are lost (e.g. due to malware or a broken device) and store them not only on the physical object but also in cloud storage for greater reliability
- Remember that ransomware is a criminal offence. You shouldn’t pay a ransom. If you become a victim, report it to your local law enforcement agency. Try to find a decryptor on the internet first – some of them are available for free here: https://noransom.kaspersky.com
- Educating the staff in cybersecurity hygiene is necessary to prevent attacks from happening. Kaspersky Interactive Protection Simulation Games offer a special scenario for local public administration that is focused on threats relevant for them
- Use a security solution for organisation to protect business data from ransomware such as Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. The product has behaviour detection, anomaly control and exploit prevention capabilities that detect known and unknown threats and prevent malicious activity
- One can enhance their preferred third-party security solution with the free Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool
Most Read Articles
Have Your Say
What new tech or developments are you most anticipating this year?